Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF : No. 171 MM 2014 ATTORNEY GENERAL, : : Petitioner : : : v. : : : SUPERVISING JUDGE OF THE THIRTY- : FIFTH STATEWIDE INVESTIGATI

The appeal in this case is from the judgment, entered on the fifth day of March, 1900, admitting the will to probate, in favor of proponent, and also from the order denying contestant's motion for a new trial. The appeal from the judgment not having been taken within time, that branch of the appeal cannot be considered. Many alleged errors are assigned in the motion for a new trial, but in the argument of appellant's counsel on the appeal denying said motion, stress is laid principally

Pennewill, J., charging the jury: Gentlemen of the jury:—This action was brought by William F. Little, who has since died, against the American Telephone - and Telegraph Company, a corporation of this State, for the recovery of damages which-it is alleged he suffered by reason of the negligence of the said company. Since the death of the original plaintiff, his administrator, William G. Li

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN Honorable Cerlton.Woore, _ Ch8lrma~ cmttes on mmntaes House Of Rep??rsentatives Forty-ninthLegialaturs Austin, Texas Dear Sir: __-- 128 ionalitj of d 1 RO. 229, re- compensationof