Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

7 opinions for “Wolf, Nicholas v. Schneider, Ken”

United States v. Mandellpublic domain

District Court, S.D. New York · 2010-04-30 · Published · cited 5× · 710 F. Supp. 2d 368; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42733; 2010 WL 1780961

710 F.Supp.2d 368 (2010) UNITED STATES of America v. Ross MANDELL, Stephen Shea, Adam Harrington a/k/a "Adam Rukdeschel," Arn Wilson, Robert Grabowski and Michael Passaro, Defendants. No. 09 Cr. 662(PAC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 30, 2010. *371 Alexander J. Willscher, Joshua Aaron Goldberg, Nicholas Stol

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →

Berkley v. United Statespublic domain

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002-04-17 · Published · cited 5× · 52 Fed. Cl. 881; 287 F.3d 1076; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 7223; 82 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,082; 88 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1066; 2002 WL 654368

DYK, Circuit Judge, dissenting. In endorsing a facial challenge to a memorandum, and in holding that the memorandum must be assumed to dictate racial and gender discrimination without a factual hearing, the majority acts contrary to Supreme Court precedent and our own decision in Baker v. United States, 127 F.3d 1081 (Fed.Cir.1997). The majority’s approach is unsupported by any decision of the Supreme

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →

Matter of Attorneys Inviolation of Judiciary Law ? 468-apublic domain

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024-09-26 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 NY Slip Op 04648

Matter of Attorneys Inviolation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2024 NY Slip Op 04648) Matter of Attorneys Inviolation of Judiciary Law § 468-a 2024 NY Slip Op 04648 Decided on September 26, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →

State of Texas, the Texas Facilities Commission, the Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Mike Novak, in His Official Capacity as Executive Director of the TFC, and Rolland Niles, in His Official Capacity as Deputy Executive Commissioner for the System Support Services Division of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission v. Broadmoor Austin Associates, a Texas Joint Venturepublic domain

Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-08-08 · Published · cited 0×

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →

State of Texas, Acting by and Through the Texas Facilities Commission, for and on Behalf of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission; The Texas Facilities Commission; Mike Novak, in His Official Capacity as Executive Director of the Texas Facilities Commission; The Texas Health and Human Services Commission; And Rolland Niles in His Official Capacity as Deputy Executive Commissioner for the System Support Services Division of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission v. 8317 Cross Park, LLCpublic domain

Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-08-08 · Published · cited 0×

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →

United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.public domain

District Court, District of Columbia · 2006-08-17 · Published · cited 66× · 449 F. Supp. 2d 1; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57759; 2006 WL 2380622

449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →

In Re Diet Drugs (Phentermine, Fenfluramine, Dexfenfluramine) Products Liability Litigationpublic domain

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008-04-09 · Published · cited 28× · 553 F. Supp. 2d 442; 2008 WL 942592

553 F.Supp.2d 442 (2008) In re DIET DRUGS (PHENTERMINE, FENFLURAMINE, DEXFENFLURAMINE) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. This Document Relates to: Sheila Brown; et al. v. American Home Products Corporation. MDL Docket No. 1203. Civil Action No. 99-20593. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. April 8, 2008. As Corrected April 9, 2008.

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →