Cases

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS CITY OF HOLLAND, FOR PUBLICATION January 6, 2015 Plaintiff-Appellee, v No. 315541 Ottawa Circuit Court CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY,

SHAPIRO, J. (concurring). I concur. There are two separate issues in this case. The initial question is whether Mich Admin Code, R 460.3411, i.e., Michigan Public Service Commission (PSC) Rule 411, as interpreted in Great Wolf Lodge of Traverse City, LLC v Pub Serv Comm, 489 Mich 27; 799 NW2d 155 (2011), bars these plaintiff-municipalities from providi

PARIENTE, J., dissenting. Let the pro-solar energy consumers beware. Masquerading as a pro-solar energy initiative, this proposed constitutional amendment, supported by some of Florida’s major investor-owned electric utility companies, actually seeks to constitutionalize the status quo.1 The ballot title is *835affirmatively

Smith, Chief Circuit Judge *592I. Introduction Plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment that the Pennsylvania General Assembly exceeded its authority under the United States Constitution when it enacted a congressional redistricting plan that was intended to favor candidates from the Republican Party. Amended Complaint, ECF No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA INSTITUTE FOR ENERGY RESEARCH, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 22-3419 (CKK) v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (July 25, 2024) This lawsuit arises from two Freedom of I

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA INSTITUTE FOR ENERGY RESEARCH, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 22-3420 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA INSTITUTE FOR ENERGY RESEARCH, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 22-2114 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Institute for Energy Research c

UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FLORIDA EBS INVESTMENTS, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Case No. 19-3573 (RJL) ) CHAD WOLF, et al. )

Case: 21-20115 Document: 00516125010 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/10/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED D

McHUGH, Circuit Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This antitrust case arises from a series of interactions among one incipient and two established natural gas producers in a portion of western Colorado known, at least in this litigation, as the Ragged Mountain Area. Buccaneer Energy (USA) Inc. (“Buccaneer”) sued SG Interests I, Ltd., SG Interests VII, Ltd. (toge

390 B.R. 825 (2008) In re Gregory Alan WOLF, Debtor. C/A No. 07-06119-DD. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina. May 16, 2008. *826 H. Flynn Griffin, III, Columbia, SC, for Debtor. Joseph F. Buzhardt, III, Office of the United States Trustee, Columbia, SC, for U.S. Trustee. ORDER ON UNITED STATES TRUSTE

USCA4 Appeal: 24-2212 Doc: 61 Filed: 04/23/2026 Pg: 1 of 38 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-2212 RHINO ENERGY, LLC, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

[J-35-2016] [MO: Donohue, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT PENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL : No. 10 MAP 2015 DEFENSE FOUNDATION, : : Appeal from the Order of the Appellant : Commonwealth Court at No. 228 MD : 2012 dated January 7, 20

Opinion filed October 31, 2024 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-22-00307-CV __________ JARROD E. DAVIS A/K/A JARED E. DAVIS AND JAMES BRIAN HILLMAN, Appellants V. TRINITY D. CRAWFORD, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF PRECISION FRAC, LLC, BLUE GOLD ENERGY, LLC

ACCEPTED 15-25-00201-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 12/10/2025 2:10 PM No. 15-25-00201-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

OPINION BY LAZARUS, J.: Historic Home Inspection, LP, d/b/a WIN Home Inspection (“Historic”), appeals from the order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County overruling its preliminary objections, which sought to enforce an agreement for alternative dispute resolution. Upon review, we reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with the dict

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) CLARENCE E. BALDWIN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 18-1872 (EGS) ) U.S. DEPART

Jeffrey Alker Meyer, District Judge: This appeal principally calls on us to examine the scope of the "outside salesman" exemption to the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq. , and New York Labor Law ("NYLL") §§ 650 et seq . An outside salesman is an employee who regular