⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Wolff v. Lewis”

District Court, S.D. Texas · 2015-01-23 · Published · cited 8× · 81 F. Supp. 3d 543; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7699; 2015 WL 337682
OPINION AND ORDER OF REMAND MELINDA HARMON, District Judge. The above referenced cause, removed by Defendant Bees Brothers, LLC (“Bees *548Brothers”) from the 334th Judicial District Court in Chambers County, Texas on both federal question jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1331, and diversity jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1), purportedly see
District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2019-01-07 · Published · cited 1× · 358 F. Supp. 3d 505
c. Establish new state House and state Senate districting plans that comply with the North Carolina Constitution, if the North Carolina General Assembly fails to enact new state House and state Senate districting plans comporting with the North Carolina Constitution in a timely manner; *508d. Grant Plaintiffs such other and f
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001-08-29 · Published · cited 6× · 754 N.E.2d 589; 2001 Ind. App. LEXIS 1476; 2001 WL 985584
754 N.E.2d 589 (2001) Mike WOLFF and Carol Anderson, Appellants-Plaintiffs, v. MOORESVILLE PLAN COMMISSION, Appellee-Defendant. No. 55A01-0011-CV-387. Court of Appeals of Indiana. August 29, 2001. *590 C. Duane O'Neal, Lewis & Kappes, P.C., Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellants. Rodric C. Bray, Harris & Currens
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999-11-02 · Published · cited 4× · 195 F.3d 37; 338 U.S. App. D.C. 422; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 28146; 1999 WL 987105
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS. ROGERS, Circuit Judge: This case is here for a second time on claims of sentencing error. In United States v. Wolff, 127 F.3d 84 (D.C.Cir.1997) (“Wolff I”) the court remanded for resen-tencing in view of the government’s breaches of the plea agreement. See
Hammad v. Lewispublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2009-08-03 · Published · cited 3× · 638 F. Supp. 2d 70; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66865; 2009 WL 2358606
638 F.Supp.2d 70 (2009) Jawad HAMMAD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Kenneth D. LEWIS, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-00446 (HHK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 3, 2009. *72 Jawad Hammad, Alexandria, VA, pro se. Deena Hammad, Alexandria, VA, pro se. Jude J. Hammad, Alexandria, VA, pro s
District Court, D. Maine · 2012-01-25 · Published · cited 0× · 841 F. Supp. 2d 448; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8452; 2012 WL 234360
ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS GEORGE Z. SINGAL, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Speedy Trial Violations (Docket # 24). The Court held a hearing on the Motion on January 25, 2012. Prior to the hearing, the parties filed a stipulation of facts (Docket # 32). Based on the Court’s review of the written and oral submissions, the Court now DENIES the Motion for reasons briefly
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2020-09-23 · Published · cited 0×
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-20-00342-CV Justin WOLFF, Appellant v. Mandi STORES, Appel
Lewis v. Gibbonspublic domain
Supreme Court of Missouri · 2002-08-05 · Published · cited 21× · 80 S.W.3d 461; 2002 Mo. LEXIS 87; 2002 WL 1787959
RONNIE L. WHITE, Judge. DISSENTING OPINION I concur fully in the dissenting opinion authored by Judge Wolff. I write separately only to note two additional concerns I have with the principal opinion. First, the majority’s interpretation of the word “prior” is inadequate and unconvincing. Second, and more importantly, I have deep reservations about the majority’s lacklus
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009-01-16 · Published · cited 34× · 2009 Ohio 158
OPINION {¶ 1} Eric A. Lewis pled no contest to fourteen counts of dogfighting, all fourth degree felonies, and three counts of possession of criminal tools, all fifth degree felonies, in the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas. The court had previously overruled Lewis' motion to suppress evidence. The trial court sentenced him to one year in prison on each count, *
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003-01-31 · Published · cited 2× · 784 N.E.2d 774; 151 Ohio App. 3d 526
OPINION {¶ 1} Terry Lewis, an attorney, seeks compensation for the remainder of a three-year employment agreement he entered into with the city of Moraine. Lewis appeals the trial court's decision granting Moraine's motion for *Page 528 summary judgment and denying his motion for summary judgment. For the reasons below, we affirm the trial court's decision. {¶ 2}
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984-12-03 · Published · cited 0× · 751 F.2d 391
751 F.2d 391 Saunders (Moses W.), Lewis (Willie)v.Naval Air Rework Facility, Almeda, California, Wolff (J.M.) NO. 83-2702 United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit DEC 03, 1984 1 Appeal From: N.D.Cal. 2<
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008-07-11 · Published · cited 0× · 2008 Ohio 3487
OPINION {¶ 1} Walter G. McMahan appeals from a judgment of the Montgomery County Court *Page 2 of Common Pleas, which granted summary judgment on McMahan's intentional tort claim in favor of his employer, Lewis Michael, Inc. {¶ 2} On February 9, 1996, McMahan was repairing a truck transmission in the course of his employment with
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016-09-30 · Published · cited 0×
Edward Mintz, MD, Plaintiff-Appellant, againstRosenberg, Minc, Falkoff & Wolff, LLP, and Peter D. Rosenberg, Defendants-Respondents. Plaintiff, as limited by his brief, appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Robert R. Reed, J.), entered March 5, 2013, as granted defendants' CPLR 3211(a)(7) motion to dismiss the Judiciary Law §
Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997-05-02 · Published · cited 4× · 679 N.E.2d 831; 287 Ill. App. 3d 822; 223 Ill. Dec. 380
679 N.E.2d 831 (1997) 287 Ill. App.3d 822 223 Ill.Dec. 380 LEWIS E., Michael E., Jamel E., Deanna C., Vanessa W., Andrew N., Robin S., Aaron M., Alia M., Roderick H., by their next friends and guardians ad litem, Gwen E., Iolo P., Ruthie W., Teresa N., Anita H., and Gail B., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Joseph A. SPAGNOLO, State Superintendent of Education; The State Board of Education; The Board of Ed
Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997-12-12 · Published · cited 10× · 706 N.E.2d 24; 124 Ohio App. 3d 292
Angel G. Lewis appeals from a judgment of the Greene County Court of Common Pleas, which dismissed her administrative appeal from a decision of the Fairborn Personnel Advisory Board ("the Personnel Board"). In 1995, Lewis was removed from her position as Community Restitution Coordinator with the Fairborn Municipal Court when a new judge was elected. She filed a notice of appeal with the Personnel Board, which hears appeals from employees in the city's classified civil service. Without
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003-10-07 · Published · cited 10× · 148 S.W.3d 80; 2003 Tenn. App. LEXIS 718
148 S.W.3d 80 (2004) Ethel HICKS, et al., derivatively on behalf of UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION, v. Drew LEWIS, et al. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Western Section, at Jackson. May 19, 2003 Session. October 7, 2003. Permission to Appeal Denied April 5, 2004. *81 Mary L. Wolff and Katherine L. Frazier, Memphis, Te
Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996-12-13 · Published · cited 5× · 688 N.E.2d 1082; 116 Ohio App. 3d 602
Angel G. Lewis is appealing the decision of the Common Pleas Court of Greene County, Ohio, to dismiss her appeal, pursuant to R.C. 2506.01, from a decision of the City of Fairborn Personnel Advisory Board. The board had held, without a hearing, that it did not have jurisdiction over Lewis's appeal to it from her *Page 603 termination as community service coordinator for the Fairborn Municipal Court because she was an "un
State v. Lewispublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017-09-07 · Published · cited 5× · 2017 Ohio 7480; 96 N.E.3d 1203
PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, P.J.: {¶ 1} Appellant Jamall Lewis ("Lewis") appeals his convictions for aggravated murder, murder, felonious assault, attempted murder, with firearm, repeat violent offender and gang specifications, and having a weapon while under disability. Lewis assigns the following errors for our review: I. The trial court erred in entering a
Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997-06-13 · Published · cited 9× · 698 N.E.2d 1023; 121 Ohio App. 3d 23; 1997 Ohio App. LEXIS 2620
E.G. Lewis appeals from a judgment entered by the court of common pleas affirming the suspension of Lewis's real estate license. The facts in this case are not in dispute, and were stipulated by the parties: "1. Prior to October 1993, the property located at 201 Maysfield Road in Oakwood, Ohio was the property of Vincent R. Hayde and Barbara A. Hayde. The Respondent herein had no involvement with the property in any way germane to the circumstances before the Hearing Officer pri
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010-11-03 · Published · cited 0× · 752 F. Supp. 2d 575
752 F.Supp.2d 575 (2010) PROFESSIONAL DOG BREEDERS ADVISORY COUNCIL, INC.; Pennsylvania Dog Breeders Association; Carl Gilgore; Nathan Myer; Daniel Esh; and Betty Stoltzfus, Plaintiffs, v. Dennis WOLFF, Secretary of Pennsylvania Dept. of Agriculture, in his official capacity; Susan West, Director, Bureau of Dog Law Enforcement, in her official capacity; Kristin Donmoyer, in her official and individual capacity; and, Drew Delenick, in his official