Cases

ORR, Justice. In this case, we are asked to decide, inter alia, the threshold issue of whether N.C.G.S. § 20-279.21 of the Financial Responsibility Act requires a commercial excess liability policy to offer separate uninsured and underinsured motorist (“UM” and “UIM,” respectively) coverage in addition to what is offered by the underlying policy. On 1 April 1994, defendant Aetna Casualty & Suret

502 S.E.2d 10 (1998) PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Francisco VASQUEZ, Javier Luna, Tyvolia Faison, Administrator of the Estate of Daryell Glen Carlisle, Virginia Lassiter, Administrator of the Estate of Amos H. Bryant, Norman Johnson, Jr., William T. Parker, T.A. Loving, Inc., a Corporation, and Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, a Corporation, Defendants. No. COA97-976.

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge: This wrongful death case requires us to determine whether a case becomes removable from a Texas state court under our diversity jurisdiction once the plaintiffs and the nondiverse defendant negotiate a settlement. Applying Texas law, we hold that it does not become removable and that the district court should have remanded this case to state court

922 F.Supp. 1072 (1996) Jose Vasquez ISQUIERDO, Plaintiff, v. William Joseph FREDERICK and Gregory Marshall Cox in their individual capacities, Defendants. No. 1:94CV00689. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina, Durham Division. April 22, 1996. *1073 Katherine E. Jean and William Webb Plyler, McMillan, Smith & Ply

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18–2469 HECTOR DANIEL LOPEZ ORDONEZ, a/k/a Hector Lopez Ordonez, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Argued: January 28, 2020

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Athey, Chaney and Lorish PUBLISHED Argued by videoconference KEEFE BUTLER OPINION BY v. Record No. 0584-22-2 JUDGE CLIFFORD L. ATHEY, JR. MARCH 28, 2023

*********** The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Harris and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives, and having reviewed the competent evidence of record, the Full Commission adopts the Opinion and Award of Deputy C

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 25, 2015. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-13-01046-CR STEVEN JAMES SEBRING, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 337th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Caus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Nos. 04-02-00886-CR, 04-02-00887-CR, 04-02-00888-CR, 04-02-00889-CR, & 04-02-00890-CR Albert J. VILLARREAL, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 81st Judicial District Co

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA ANDREW CLARK, AN INDIVIDUAL; No. 86592 AND TRACY CLARK, AN INDIVIDUAL, Appellants, vs. NADIA MARIN, AN INDIVIDUAL, Respondent. Appeal from a district court judgment on a jury verdict in a tort action and post-judgment orders denying a motion for a new trial, awarding expert and attorney fees, and assigning claims in execution of the judgment. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Monica Trujill

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-18-00471-CR ___________________________ TERRENCE COLEMAN, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from the 158th District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. F18-2347-158 Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Bassel Justice Kerr concur

AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed May 1, 2014. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00200-CR HAROLD DAVIS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

ACCEPTED 13-15-00004-CR THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS

Opinion issued August 2, 2016 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00421-CR ——————————— ERIC DEWAYNE SMALL, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

ACCEPTED 05-14-00671-CR FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS

Sears, Justice. Appellant Gary Jones appeals his conviction for felony murder,1 arguing, among other things, that because the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that venue for his trial was properly laid in Fulton County, he was denied his constitutional right to be tried in the county in which his crimes allegedly occurred.2 We hold that, without excepti

ORDER ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge. This case arises from Defendant Wedco, Inc.’s (“Wedco”) alleged violation of Title YII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VH”). Pending before the Court is Wed-co’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 108) and its Motion to Seal (ECF No. 106) portions of the summary judgment motion. Plaintiff United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) has al

Justice CASTILLO concurring. Respectfully, I agree to grant the motion for rehearing. In his motion, appellant Miguel Trevino essentially asserts that, on original submission, the panel majority handed down a “concurrence” which was the true majority opinion (1) without reviewing the points of error raised, (2) without addressing every issue raised and necessary to final disposition of the appeal, see <

MEMORANDUM. OPINION ON PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT TO DENY DISCHARGEABILITY OF DEBT PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. § 523 [Adv. Doc. No. 1] Jeff Bohm, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. Introduction Prosecution of complaints to determine dischargeability under 11 U.S.C. *720§ 523(a)(2)(A)1