Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Wood v. Wells Fargo Bank”
Azuaje v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.public domain
PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. BERGER, LAMBERT and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Daniel Loughran v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.public domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19‐3530 DANIEL LOUGHRAN and MARGARET LOUGHRAN, Plaintiffs‐Appellants, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants‐Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court
Edwards v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.public domain
TERRENCE W. BOYLE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This cause comes before the Court on appeal by Clyde Richard Edwards and Kristi Woods Edwards, the debtor-appellants, of an order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina entered August 22, 2017. [DE 1-1]. The issues have been fully briefed, and a hearing was held before the undersigned on April 10, 2018, at Elizabeth City, North Carolina. For th
Azuaje v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.public domain
PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. BERGER, LAMBERT and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Benjamin v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.public domain
AFFIRMED.
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Sheltonpublic domain
COHEN, C.J. This appeal stems from the trial court’s reluctance to grant relief from technical admissions due to counsel’s lack of diligence in pursuing relief. The attorney for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) failed to timely respond to the Sheltons’ request for admissions. 1 The allegations were then deemed adm
Mariscal v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.public domain
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. VILLANTI, C.J., and KELLY and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Vogel v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.public domain
Per Curiam. Affirmed. See Sundie v. Haren, 253 So.2d 857, 859 (Fla. 1971). Gross, May and Gerber, JJ., concur.
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Burkepublic domain
*945OPINION OF THE COURT Thomas F. Whelan, J. It is ordered that this motion (No. 004) by the plaintiff for summary judgment dismissing the affirmative defenses asserted in the answer of the Burke defendants and an award of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff on its complaint, default judgments against the remaining defendants served with proce
Schuman v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.public domain
PER CURIAM. The appellant, Katherine Schuman, raises three issues in this appeal from a final judgment of foreclosure. In her third issue, she argues that the trial court erred in denying her motion for involuntary dismissal. We disagree and affirm this issue. With regard to the two remaining issues, the appellee, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., concedes that the appellant was denied the opportunity to fully and fairly present her
Pons v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.public domain
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979).
Green v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.public domain
PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a). COHEN, BERGER, and EDWARDS, J.J., concur.
Christensen v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.public domain
PER CURIAM. Based on appellee’s concession of error, the summary final judgment of foreclosure is reversed and remanded for further proceedings. CIKLIN, C.J., WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Patterson v. Wells Fargo Bank, Nat'l Ass'npublic domain
PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
Patterson v. Wells Fargo Bank, Nat'l Ass'npublic domain
PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
Whitburn, LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.public domain
BY ORDER OF THE COURT.' Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for rehearing filed February. 1, 2016, IT IS ORDERED that Appellant’s motion for rehearing is granted in part and denied in part. The opinion issued on January 15, 2016, is withdrawn, and the attached opinion is substituted therefor. No further motions for rehearing will be considered.
Whitburn, LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.public domain
MORRIS, Judge. Whitburn, LLC, appeals an order denying its motion to cancel foreclosure sale in the mortgage foreclosure action filed by Wells Fargo, N.A., against property owners Basheer Ally and Rooshnee Ally. We affirm because Whitburn, LLC, does not have standing to challenge the foreclosure sale. On December 7, 2012, Wells Fargo filed a one-count
Richard v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.public domain
KURT S. ODENWALD, Judge. Introduction Elizabeth Richard (“Elizabeth”)1 appeals from the trial court’s grant of partial summary judgment in favor of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) and HSBC Bank USA, National Association (“HSBC Bank”) in a lawsuit involving a parcel of real property, a promissory note, and a deed of trust. Elizabeth filed a nine-count petition
Woods v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.public domain
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. There is, by now, a significant body of commentary on the housing market’s most recent boom and bust. Little could we add about the development, proliferation, and ultimate collapse of the mortgage-backed securities market that has not already been said. Writing against that background, we recite here only the most relevant aspects of the market’s recen
Farasat v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLIAM D. QUARLES, JR., District Judge. Shahed Farasat sued Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (‘Wells Fargo”) for fraud- and contract claims. Pending is Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. For the following reasons, Wells Fargo’s motion will be granted. 1. Background1 Farasat owns and resides at -110 Ha