Cases

563 So.2d 385 (1990) In the Matter of WOODROW WILSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. and Mr. John Schwegmann, Schwegmann Giant Super Markets, Inc. No. CA 89 0442. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. May 30, 1990. George K. Anding, Jr., Ranier & Anding, Baton Rouge, for appellants Woodrow Wilson Const. Co., Inc., John Schwegmann and Schwegmann Giant Super Markets, In

471 F.3d 111 William Woodrow WILSON, Petitioner-Appellee-Cross-Appellant,v.Alberto GONZALES,* Attorney General of the United States; Doris Meissner, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service; Edward McElroy, New York District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service; Lynne Underdown, New Orleans District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service; Immigration and Na

OAKES, Senior Circuit Judge: The United States appeals and Petitioner-Appellee-Cross-Appellant William *113Woodrow Wilson (“Wilson”) cross-appeals from a November 17, 2004, judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Wood, /.), granting habeas relief to Wilson and remanding the case to the Bureau of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) f

PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge. This case requires us to examine two sections of the Veterans Benefits Act of 2002 (‘VBA”), and to determine whether, under section 402 of the Act, we have jurisdiction to decide the case before us, and whether, under section 403, the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims properly decided the case before it. The veteran in

Rose, J. *1189Initially, defendant contends that the proceedings before County Court were a nullity because the indictment was transferred to Supreme Court but then tried in County Court without any order transferring the case back to County Court. We cannot agree. Defendant’s reliance on People ex rel. Dold v Martin (284 App Div 127 [1954]) is mi

606 A.2d 1017 (1992) Woodrow WILSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 90-1566. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued October 9, 1991. April 14, 1992. *1018 Richard Greenlee, Public Defender Service, with whom James Klein and Page Kennedy, Public Defender Service, were on the brief, for appellant

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 6, 1999 WOODROW WILSON v. SENTENCE INFORMATION SERVICES, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 98-185-I Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr., Chancellor No. M1998-00939-COA-R3-CV - Filed April 26, 2001 This otherwise routine d

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2020-CA-00742-COA WILLIAM JODY CROMWELL APPELLANT v. NANCY WILLIAMS AND WOODROW APPELLEES BRAND III DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/23/2020 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JOHN R. WHITE COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: MONROE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLAN

| ¶ JONES, Judge. Plaintiffs/Appellants filed this class action lawsuit alleging that their property was damaged as a result of pile driving and movement of heavy trucks through their neighborhood by the defendants/ap-pellees. Plaintiffs appeal the judgment of the trial court dismissing their causes of action. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm. FACTS The Louisiana Dep

LONG, Senior Judge: Appellant Thomas E. Wilson seeks relief from a 2010 judgment that he violated the terms of a Voluntary Separation, Support, Custody and Property Settlement Agreement (“Agreement”) executed with his wife, appellee Louise Hayes. The parties had executed the Agreement in conjunction with their 1993 divorce. Appellee filed a complaint for breach of contract on February 15, 2002. This legal action largely focuse

526 So.2d 1248 (1988) Joseph R. BERNARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WOODROW WILSON CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 87-159. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. April 6, 1988. Writ Denied May 20, 1988. *1249 Juneau, Hill, Judice, Hill & Adley, P.L.C., Edward J. Marquet, Lafayette

942 N.E.2d 717 (2011) UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sidney WILSON and Woodrow Wilson, Defendants-Appellees. No. 1-09-3061. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Second Division. January 18, 2011. *718 Samuel A. Shelist, Shelist Law Firm LLC, Chicago, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Arthur H.

55 F.3d 399 Pens. Plan Guide P 23910QG. Bruce WILSON; Marco L. Gilliam; William H. Jones;Robert E. McVey; Jerry Mooneyham; Edwin R. Acheson; J.Marlene Adams; Betty E. Aldridge; Barbara Alexander; JoAnn Altschul; Virginia S. Amyx; Brenda J. Andrews; SandraK. Anglin; Islo D. Ashmore; Jerry L. Atwood; James D.Bailey; Jimmie F. Bailey; Margaret A. Bailey; Patsy R.Bailey; Jerry F. Baker; John C. Baker; Kat

No. 1-09-3061 SECOND DIVISION JANUARY 18, 2011 UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE ) COMPANY, ) Appeal from the ) Circuit Court of Plaintiff-Appellant, ) Cook County

DREW, J. I,Elliot B. Stonecipher filed a petition for declaratory and injunctive relief against Caddo Parish (“Parish”), the Caddo Parish Commission (“Commission”), individual Caddo Parish Commissioners (“Commissioners”), Caddo Parish Administrator Woodrow Wilson, and Caddo Parish Director of Finance and Human Resources Erica Bryant. In his petition, Stonecipher challenged the legality of Parish ordinance

DIANA E. MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Appellants, former management employees of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWBT) who accepted the terms of a severance incentive plan offered in 1990, filed this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 Ú.S.C. § 1001 et. seq., claiming that SWBT; its parent company, SBC Communications; and its Vice President of Human Resources, Robert A. Dickemper, brea

972 So.2d 461 (2007) Woodrow WILSON, et al. v. The TOWN OF MAMOU, et al. No. 2007-409. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. December 19, 2007. *463 Jonathan C. Vidrine, Ville Platte, LA, for Plaintiffs Woodrow Wilson, et al. Lisa E. Mayer, John F. Wilkes, Joy C. Rabalais, Dayna M. Edwards, Lana Duhon, Lafayette, LA

Sharpe, J. Petitioner, Woodrow Wilson, in his application for writ of habeas corpus and ancillary writ of certiorari claims that he is illegally imprisoned and restrained in the State prison at Jackson, Michigan. We issued our writ to inquire into the matter. In response to the ancillary writ of certiorari we have the records pertaining to Wilson’s detention. It appears that in September, 1951, petitioner was c

663 A.2d 558 (1995) Woodrow J. WILSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 94-CF-64. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued March 8, 1995. Decided August 21, 1995. *559 Alan L. Balaran, Washington, DC, for appellant. Gregory A. Gruber, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Eric H. Holde

542 So.2d 568 (1989) Woodrow WILSON and Mary Wilson v. Huey J. WILSON and H.J. Wilson Company, Inc. No. 88 CA 0330. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. April 11, 1989. *569 Thomas E. Balhoff, Baton Rouge, for plaintiffs-appellants Woodrow Wilson and Mary Wilson. Robert E. Barkley, Jr., New Orleans, for defendants-