Cases

343 F.Supp.2d 762 (2004) OLDCASTLE MATERIALS, INC., Plaintiff, v. Roy ROHLIN, Phyllis Rohlin, Gregory A. Bruening, and Keith B. Bruening, Defendants. No. C 04-4034-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Western Division. November 18, 2004. *764 Mark McCormick, Belin Lamson McCormick Zumbach Flynn, Des Moines, IA for plaint

416 B.R. 132 (2009) In re ADAMS COUNTY ASPHALT CO., Debtor. Adams County Asphalt Co., Plaintiff v. Oldcastle, Inc., and Pennsy Supply, Inc., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 1-03-bk-00722. Adversary No. 1-08-ap-00064. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. May 4, 2009. Opinion Denying Reconsideration September 29, 2009. Stephen G. Bresset,

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 13-1560 Filed December 24, 2014 TRUSTEES OF THE IOWA LABORERS DISTRICT COUNCIL HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST; TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS NATIONAL PENSION FUND; and TRUSTEES OF THE IOWA BUILDERS RETIREMENT FUND, Plaintiffs, vs. ANKENY COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, BETTS & BEER CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., WESTERN SURETY COMPANY, GROVE MASONRY, INC., TWIN CITY CONCRETE PROD

J-A28034-19 2020 PA Super 58 THOMAS POWERS : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA Appellant : : : v. : :

J-A28034-19 2020 PA Super 58 THOMAS POWERS : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA Appellant : : : v. : :

ORDER Amy Totenberg, United States District Judge This matter, one of a series of actions brought by Dr. Griffin,1 is before the Court on Defendant Verizon Communications, Inc.’s (“Verizon”) Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 8]. For the following reasons, the Motion is GRANTED. 1. BACKGROUND FACTS At the motion to dismiss stage, th

ORDER Amy Totenberg, United States District Judge This matter, one of a series of actions brought by Dr. Griffin,1 is before the Court on Defendant Lockheed Martin Corporation’s (“Lockheed”) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Doc. 8]. For the *1273following reasons, the Motion is GRANTED. I. B

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE WILDFIRE PRODUCTIONS, ) L.P., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2021-1072-PAF ) TEAM LEMIEUX LLC and ) LEMIEUX GROUP, L.P., ) ) Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION PAUL W. GRIMM, District Judge. While shopping at one of Defendant Wal-Mart’s stores, Plaintiff was detained and handcuffed by an employee after she was suspected of shoplifting—although it appears that she never was prosecuted for any crime. Plaintiff has brought this action alleging false arrest, false imprisonment, assault, and battery arising out of the detention. Defendan

OPINION AND ORDER ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., United States District Judge: Plaintiff Barbara Luka brings this action against her former employer, Defendant Bard College, and three individuals affiliated with Bard: Frank Scalzo, Michele Dominy, and Leon Botstein. She alleges that Defendants discriminated against her on the basis of her age, gender, perceived disability, and sexual orientation, in violation of the

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

518 F.3d 153 (2008) Alice CAMARILLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CARROLS CORPORATION, Magliocca Stores, Inc., Reeher Majik, Inc., El Rancho Foods, Inc. and Wendonie, LLC, Defendants-Appellees. Docket No. 06-4909-cv. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: January 10, 2008. Decided: February 8, 2008. *154

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER HONORABLE SARA LIOI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on the appeal of plaintiff/appellant1 John B. Pid-cock, as creditor trustee (“Pidcock” or “creditor trustee”) of Schwab Industries, Inc. Creditor Trust pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1) and Bankruptcy Rule 8003 from two orders entered by the United States Bankrupt

*568OPINION By the Court, Cherry, C.J.: The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida has certified three questions to this court relating to the viability of equitable subrogation and the enforceability of contractual subordination against mechanic’s lien claimants under Nevada’s mechanic’s and materialman

POTTERFIELD, J. Oldcastle APG West, Inc. (“Oldcastle”) appeals from the district court’s denial of its erossclaim for an amount owed under an open account with Grove Masonry, Inc. (“Grove Masonry”). It also appeals the district court’s award of direct and consequential damages to Grove Masonry on its counterclaim against Oldcastle for defective product. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.<

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER PAUL G. GARDEPHE, United States District Judge Plaintiff Charisma World Wide Corp, S.A. (“Charisma”) brings this suit .for trademark infringement under the Lan-ham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), against Avon Products Inc.1 Charisma alléges that *452Avon directed its Panamanian subsidiary to inf

*953OPINION By the Court, Hardesty, J.: In this opinion, we address an important policy question concerning the proper scope of the record before this court and the extent to which this court may determine facts, if at all, when it considers a certified question from a federal court. The present matter arises in a pending certification

ORDER AND OPINION ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., District Judge: Stone Mountain USA LLC (“SMU LLC”) and Stone Mountain USA Corp. (“SMU Corp.,” and together with SMU LLC, “Stone II”), Rosenthal & Rosenthal (“R & R”), and Kenneth Orr (collectively, “Moving Defendants”) move separately to dismiss claims against them. On December 12, 2012, Tommy Lee Handbags (“Tommy Lee” or “TL”), a Hong-Kong based supp

06-4909-cv Camarillo v. Carrols Corp. 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 _______________ 4 5 August Term, 2007 6 7 (Argued: January 10, 2008 Decided: February 8, 2008 ) 8 9 Docket No. 06-4909-cv 1

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, United States District Judge Plaintiff Jan Harris brings this action for trespass and an accounting against Defendants TD Ameritrade Inc., TD Ameritrade Clearing, Inc., Scottrade Inc. (collectively, the "Brokerage Defendants") and Defendants Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation, Depository Trust Company, and Cede & Co. (collectively, the "DTC Defendants"). The Court has jurisdiction of this action pursua