Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Xavier E. Carl Poole”
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SHARESTATES INVESTMENTS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:18-cv-01275 (CJN) O.N.C.E. APPRAISALS, LLC, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Sharestates Investments, LLC financed the purchase of real estate. 2d Am. Compl. ¶ 9, ECF No. 60. The
Lee v. Whispering Oaks Home Owners' Ass'npublic domain
797 F.Supp.2d 740 (2011) Ted D. LEE and Jerelene W. Lee, Plaintiff, v. WHISPERING OAKS HOME OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. SA-11-CA-0064-XR. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, San Antonio Division. June 23, 2011. *742 Jesse R. Castillo, Castillo Snyder, P.C., Ted D. Lee, Gunn, Lee & Cave, P.C
People v. Henriquezpublic domain
Kruger, J. *7 Defendant Christopher Henriquez killed his pregnant wife and their two-year-old daughter. He stipulated at trial that he killed the victims with malice aforethought, but asserted that the murders were not premeditated and were instead the unplanned
Baldwin Properties, Inc. v. Sharppublic domain
HOWARD, Judge. Plaintiff Baldwin Properties, Inc. (“Baldwin”) appeals from an order by the Circuit Court of Clay County, Missouri, granting summary judgment to Defendant Frank W. Sharp, Jr. (“Sharp”). Baldwin is in the business of building homes. In July, 1993, Sharp, a licensed Professional Engineer, inspected one of Baldwin’s newly-built homes for Judy and Rande Kessler (the “Kesslers”). The Kesslers had been negotiating wit
F.F.P. Operating Partners, L.P. v. Duenezpublic domain
237 S.W.3d 680 (2007) F.F.P. OPERATING PARTNERS, L.P., d/b/a Mr. Cut Rate # 602, Petitioner, v. Xavier DUENEZ and Wife Irene Duenez, As Next Friends of Carlos Duenez and Pablo Duenez, Minors, Respondents. No. 02-0381. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued November 30, 2005. Decided May 11, 2007. *681 Oscar H. Villarreal
City of Dallas v. Arredondopublic domain
OPINION Opinion by Justice LANG-MIERS. The City of Dallas filed these interlocutory appeals from orders denying its pleas to the jurisdiction in four lawsuits filed against the City by current and former police officers, firefighters, and rescue officers (the Officers) alleging that the City breached its contract with them regarding their pay. We consolidated the appeals for the purpose of
Amazon.com, Inc. v. Comm'rpublic domain
AMAZON.COM, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RespondentAmazon.com, Inc. v. Comm'rDocket No. 31197-12United States Tax Court
Microsoft Corporation v. Motorola Mobilitypublic domain
OPINION BERZON, Circuit Judge: We live in an age in which the intercon-nectivity of a wide range of modern technological products is vital. To achieve that interconnection, patent-holders often join together in compacts requiring licensing certain patents on reasonable and non *1030
Coleman v. Statepublic domain
I agree with the majority's unpublished memorandum as to all issues except Issue IV. As to Issue IV, I dissent, based on Judge Shaw's special writing in Poole v. State, [Ms. CR-99-1200, Aug. 31, 2001] ___ So.2d ___ (Ala.Crim.App. 2001). As to those points of law on which I disagree with Judge Shaw, see my special writing in Poole, supra. *Page 167 DECISIONS OF THE ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPIN
In re Suspensions of Att'yspublic domain
Cite as 2015 Ark. 200 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSIONS OF Opinion Delivered May 7, 2015 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM On May 14, 2014, we held unconstitutional former Rule VII(C) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar to the extent the former rule provided for the suspension of attorneys
People v. Vargaspublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. EDUARDO DAVID VARGAS, Defendant and Appellant. S101247 Orange County Superior Court 99CF0831 July 13, 2020 Justice Cuéllar authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye and Just
City of Dallas, Texas v. Willis, Kevin Michaelpublic domain
Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM
City of Dallas, Texas v. Arredondo, Anthonypublic domain
Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM
State of Tennessee v. Lemaricus Devall Davidsonpublic domain
OPINION Sharon G. Lee, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Jeffrey S. Bivins, C. J., and Cornelia A. Clark and Holly Kirby, JJ., joined. A jury imposed two sentences of death on the defendant after convicting him of multiple counts of first degree murder, especially aggravated robbery, especi
Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Albrightpublic domain
HARRELL, J. On 17 February 2006, Appellant, Exxon Mobil Corporation (“Exxon”), reported a leak of approximately 26,000 gallons of gasoline from the underground tanks at its fueling station located in Jacksonville, Maryland.1 The seemingly cursed Jacksonville community, the unfortunate site of multiple gasoline leaks over the years, see, e.g., Exxon Corp. v. Yarema, 69 Md.App. 124, 516 A.2
In re Hardieplank Fiber Cement Siding Litig.public domain
II. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background 1. Overview of the Hardieplank Product Defendant James Hardie Building Products Inc. ("Hardie") originated in Australia in 1888, but now sells fiber-cement products around the world. ( [Docket No. 260] Moriarity Decl., Ex. B, Exponent Report at 6.) Fiber-cement is a composite material made of sand, cement, and cellulose
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
Ronald Koons v. Attorney General New Jerseypublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ Nos. 23-1900 & 23-2043 _____________ RONALD KOONS; NICHOLAS GAUDIO; JEFFREY M. MULLER; GIL TAL; SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION INC; FIREARMS POLICY COALITION INC; COALITION OF NEW JERSEY FIREARM OWNERS; NEW JERSEY SECOND AMENDMENT SOCIETY v. ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY A
Ronald Koons v. Attorney General New Jerseypublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ Nos. 23-1900 & 23-2043 _____________ RONALD KOONS; NICHOLAS GAUDIO; JEFFREY M. MULLER; GIL TAL; SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION INC; FIREARMS POLICY COALITION INC; COALITION OF NEW JERSEY FIREARM OWNERS; NEW JERSEY SECOND AMENDMENT SOCIETY v. ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY A