Cases

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 05-2-40758-1, Sharon S. Armstrong, J., entered June 26, 2006. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

—Appeal by the People, as limited by their brief, from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Eng, J.), dated October 26, 1995, as granted that branch of the defendant Xia Chen’s omnibus motion which was to reduce count four of the indictment as to that defendant; (2) so much of an order of the same court, also dated October 26,1995, as granted that branch of the defendant Ai-Shi Jiang’s omnibus motion which was to dismiss count four

OPINION PER CURIAM. Xue Hua Chen and her daughter Qiao Xia Yang, citizens of China, seek review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), denying their motion to reopen proceedings. For the reasons that follow, we will deny the petition. Chen and Yang entered the United States without valid documents in January 2004. After being placed in removal proceedings, Chen applied fo

MEMORANDUM * Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s dismissal of their action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) due to their counsel’s lack of compliance with court orders. We review this decision for an abuse of discretion. See Hernandez v. City of El Monte, 138 F.3d 393, 398 (9th Cir.1998). Finding no such abuse, we affirm. Because the parties are familiar with the history of thi

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JIN YANG, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:22-cv-03836 (TNM) ICS PROTECTIVE SERVICES, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This case arises from a sidewalk scuffle between protesters, security guards, and police outside the

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Xia Lin-Chen, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a June 27, 2008 order of the BIA affirming the September 14, 2006 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Helen Sichel, denying her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Xia Lin-Chen, No. A98 357 587 (B.I.A. June 27, 2008), aff'g </

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Xia Lin-Chen, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a June 27, 2008 order of the BIA affirming the September 14, 2006 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Helen Sichel, denying her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Xia Lin-Chen, No. A98 357 587 (B.I.A. June 27, 2008), aff'g </

*73SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Xia Li, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of an April 11, 2006 order of the BIA affirming the November 15, 2004 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Noel Brennan denying petitioner’s application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. In re Xia Li, No. A 96 007 150

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Xia Chen, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a July 13, 2006 order of the BIA affirming the February 1, 2005 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Noel Ferris denying Chen’s applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Xia Chen, No. A 79 389 243 (B.I.A. July 13, 2006), aff'g No. A 79

PER CURIAM: * Petitioner Fangwen Yang, a citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA’s) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). Yang based his applications on his resistance to China’s family planning policy. At the merits hearing before the Immigration

06-2959-ag Xia v. Mukasey 1 2 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 3 4 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 5 6 August Term, 2006 7 8 9 (Argued: April 24, 2007 Decided: December 7, 2007) 10 11 Docket No. 06-2959-ag 12 13 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x 14 15 XIU FEN XIA, 16 17 Petitioner, 18 19 -v.- 20 21 MICHAEL MUKASEY, Attorney General,* 22 23

S UMMARY ORDER Petitioner Qiu Xia Lin, a citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a July 20, 2005 order of the BIA affirming the October 28, 2003 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Adam Opaciuch denying Lin’s application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Qiu Xia Lin, No. A 78 400 330 (B.I.A. July 20, 2005), affg No. A 78 400 3

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Dan-Xia Cao, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a May 10, 2006 order of the BIA affirming the January 19, 2005 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Brigitte LaForest denying petitioner’s application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Dan-Xia Cao, No. A 78 848 711 (B.I.A. May 10, 2006), aff'g in part

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Yang Lin, a citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review *121of a December 12, 2007 order of the BIA affirming the April 18, 2006 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Thomas J. Mulligan denying Lin’s application for asylum and withholding of removal. In re Yang Lin, No. A 98 560 565 (B.I.A. Dec. 12, 2007), ajfg No

SUMMARY ORDER Xiu Hui Yang, a native and citizen of China, seeks review of an October 22, 2008 order of the BIA affirming the September 12, 2007 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Brigitte Laforest, which denied her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Xiu Hui Yang, No. A94 917 604 (B.I.A. Oct. 22, 2008), affg No. A94 917 604 (Immi

510 F.3d 162 (2007) XIU FEN XIA, Petitioner, v. Michael MUKASEY, Attorney General,[*] Respondent. Docket No. 06-2959-ag. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: April 24, 2007. Decided: December 7, 2007. *163 Joshua Bardavid, Law Office of Joshua Bardavid, New York, N.Y. (Peter D. Lobel

SUMMARY ORDER Xiu Hui Yang, a native and citizen of China, seeks review of an October 22, 2008 order of the BIA affirming the September 12, 2007 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Brigitte Laforest, which denied her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Xiu Hui Yang, No. A94 917 604 (B.I.A. Oct. 22, 2008), affg No. A94 917 604 (Immi

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Yi Chi Yang, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a January 30, 2008 order of the BIA affirming the May 24, 2006 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Steven R. Abrams, denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Yi Chi Yang, No. A 97 959 060 (B.I.A. Jan. 30, 2008), aff'g N

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Yi Chi Yang, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a January 30, 2008 order of the BIA affirming the May 24, 2006 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Steven R. Abrams, denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Yi Chi Yang, No. A 97 959 060 (B.I.A. Jan. 30, 2008), aff'g N

496 F.3d 268 (2007) BIAO YANG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Alberto GONZALES, United States Attorney General, Respondent-Appellee. Ming Liang Lin, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Alberto Gonzales, United States Attorney General, Respondent-Appellee. Docket Nos. 06-2735-ag, 06-3224-ag. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: June 1, 2007. Decide