Cases

OPINION NAJAM, Judge. STATEMENT OF THE CASE Dayron Bell appeals the trial court's order finding him in contempt. Bell raises four issues for our review, but we consider only the following dispositive issue: whether this appeal is moot because Bell has served his sentence and none of Bell's issues on appeal justify our review under th

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VINCENT KEITH BELL, No. 22-16580 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-01245-SI v. WILLIAMS, #6040; CITY AND OPINION COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendants-Appellants, and FISHER, #1152; LEUNG, #2019; ANTHONY BRYANT; JOHNSON BUI; ROBERT DALY; KRISTIAN DEJESUS; DENNIS WALSH; ROBERT YEUNG, Defend

[Cite as State v. Bell, 2019-Ohio-340.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 106842 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE

NUMBER 13-18-00243-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG YVETTE HERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. FIRST BANK D/B/A FIRST BANK MORTGAGE, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, Appellees. On appeal from the County Co

FILED U.S. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit NOT FOR PUBLICATION June 18, 2019 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL

COURT OF APPEALS COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS DONALD B. BURNEY, )

MEMORANDUM CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER, District Judge. Shortly after a new administration took office in Lackawanna County in January of 2008, the seventeen plaintiffs in these two actions, all of whom were County employees who supported the prior administration, were terminated. They claim that Democratic County Commissioners Corey O’Brien and Michael Washo terminated them because of their affiliation

801 A.2d 117 (2002) Antonio E. BELL, William D. McClain & Charlie Webb, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. Nos. 94-CF-937, 94-CF-794, 94-CF-1480, 95-CO-618, 97-CO-939, 99-CO-1341, 99-CO-1507, 99-CO-1551. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued January 24, 2002. Decided June 27, 2002. *119 Mark J. R

PER CURIAM: This case requires us to decide if Pinkerton co-conspirator liability continues to apply to section 924(e) cases after the Supreme Court’s decision in Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137, 116 S.Ct. 501, 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995). We conclude that it does and therefore affirm the d

FINCH, Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (November 19, 2003) This matter comes before the Court, pursuant to FED. R. ClV. P. 56, on the motion of Defendant University of the Virgin Islands’ Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons expressed herein, Defendant’s motion will be granted in part, denied in part. I. Background Plaintiff Gina Bell brings t

PUBLISH IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT --------------- No. 96-2626 Non-Argument Calendar --------------- D. C. Docket No. 1:95

459 S.E.2d 315 (1995) James E. BELL and Margaret V. Bell, Appellants, v. EVENING POST PUBLISHING COMPANY, Andy Morgan, Ivan V. Anderson, Jr., and Evening Post and Courier, Defendants, of whom Evening Post Publishing Company is, Respondent. No. 2368. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Submitted June 6, 1995. Filed July 3, 1995.

*474 WISDOM, Circuit Judge: This appeal presents several questions, the most significant of which is whether postal inspectors violated the Fourth Amendment rights of the defendant when they conducted a warrantless search of the contents of a private postal box rented by the defendant’s husband. We conclu

McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge. This matter began in 1996 with a class action complaint filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri by a group of homeowners in minority neighborhoods seeking federal class action certification pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. The original plaintiffs alleged that several insurance eompanies had violated

74 F.Supp.2d 841 (1999) John BURTON, Plaintiff, v. SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTEMS, INC. d/b/a Cellular One-Central Illinois, Defendant. No. 98-3055. United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Springfield Division. November 17, 1999. *842 James P. Baker, Springfield, IL, for plaintiff. Thomas H. Wilson, Stephen R. Kaufm

(2008) Jeffrey & Suzanne CHUBB, Plaintiffs v. ON-TIME WILDLIFE FEEDERS, Defendant v. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A., et al., Third-Party Defendants. Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-488. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. September 17, 2008. MEMORANDUM YVETTE KANE, Chief Judge. Before the Court is a motion for summary jud

Opinion issued April 7, 2026. In the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00611-CV ——————————— TRANSPORTES JUAN CHAVEZ, S.A. DE C.V., Appellant v. MARIBEL DEHARO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REP

825 F.Supp.2d 561 (2011) Rosa RIVERA, et al., Plaintiffs v. LEBANON SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant. Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-00147. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. November 16, 2011. *562 Benjamin D. Geffen, Michael Churchill, Philadelphia, PA, Thomas B. Schmidt, III, Pepper Hamilton, LLP, Harrisburg, PA, for Plainti

BLEICH, J. (Pro Tempore) It This appeal arises out of the First Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo, State of Louisiana. The defendant, Peter E. Haley, was convicted by a jury of one count of possession of pornography involving juveniles in violation of La. R.S. 14:81.1. Haley was subsequently sentenced to eight years at hard labor without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence, with credit for time serve

585 F.Supp.2d 1010 (2008) Jose REYES and Sonia Olazaba, on behalf of themselves individually and as the parents and guardians of Denise Fernandez and Kimberly Fernandez, minors, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, Chicago Police Officers Jerome Finnegan, Star # 5167, Carl Suchocki, Star # 18391, James Elderidge, Star # 2081, John Blake, Star # 454, Eric Olsen, Star # 19456, Gregory Insley, Star # 14260, Frank Villareal, Star # 10438, B. Corcoran, Sta