Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
19 opinions for “Yolanda McCord”
FILED Dec 08, 2021 09:32 AM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF
Thomas v. United Statespublic domain
KING, Senior Judge: After a jury trial, Todd Matthew Thomas was convicted of five counts of first-degree burglary, in violation of D.C.Code § 22-801(a) (2007 Supp.) (one count each from the B.C., C.T., F.H., W.C., and M.C. incidents); one count of attempted second-degree burglary (the S.C. incident), in violation of D.C.Code §§ 22-801(b), -1808 (2007 Supp.); two counts of assault (one count from the W.C. incident and one cou
Gietzen v. Covenant RE Management, Inc.public domain
Filed 9/24/19 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX ROD E. GIETZEN et al., 2d Civil No. B287339 (Super. Ct. No. 56-2012- Plaintiffs and Appellants, 00413479-CU-CO-VTA) (Ventura County) v. OPINION
Bacchus v. United Statespublic domain
970 A.2d 269 (2009) Nathaniel Ivan BACCHUS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 06-CM-1263. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued March 26, 2008. Decided April 30, 2009. *271 Cedric Miller, Washington, for appellant. Ademuyiwa Bamiduro, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Jeffrey A.
United States v. Goochpublic domain
665 F.3d 1318 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. Larry A. GOOCH, Jr., Appellant. No. 07-3106. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued September 12, 2011. Decided January 6, 2012. *1321 Stephen C. Leckar, appointed by the court, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appel
McCloud v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurancepublic domain
ORDER PANNER, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation [# 23], and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Plaintiff filed objections to the report. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., <
Ross v. University of Tulsapublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER TERENCE C. KERN, United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Civil Contempt (“Motion for Contempt”), in which Defendant the University of Tulsa (“TU”) seeks a citation of civil contempt and sanctions against Plaintiff and her counsel for “multiple intentional violations of protective orders concerning evidence produced in this case.” (Doc. 311 at 1.) TU see
Mungo v. United Statespublic domain
987 A.2d 1145 (2010) Jeremiah MUNGO & Lamont A. Peete, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. Nos. 00-CF-688, 00-CF-1145, 08-CO-236, 08-CO-237. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued June 26, 2009. Decided January 28, 2010. *1147 Mindy A. Daniels, appointed by the court, for appellant Jeremiah Mungo.<
Garrod Investments, Inc. v. Schlegelpublic domain
139 S.W.3d 759 (2004) GARROD INVESTMENTS, INC., Appellant, v. Robert SCHLEGEL and Myrna Schlegel, Appellees. No. 13-01-830-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi-Edinburg. July 15, 2004. *761 Keith C. Livesay, Roberto Rene (Bobby) Garcia, Garcia & Rodriguez, McAllen, for appellant. Donald E. Godwin, John F. Mart
. NUMBER 13-01-830-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CO
Reyes v. Statepublic domain
84 S.W.3d 633 (2002) Gilberto Guadalupe REYES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas. No. 73805. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. September 11, 2002. *634 Mike Brown, Lubbock, for Appellant. Roy Carper, Farwell, Matthew Paul, State's Attorney, Austin, for State. OPINION MEYERS, J., delivered th
City of El Cenizo, Texas v. State of Texaspublic domain
EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: We withdraw our prior opinion of March 13, 2018, City of El Cenizo v. Texas , 885 F.3d 332 (5th Cir. 2018), and substitute the following, the purpose of which is to eliminate reference to United States v
Capital Title Co., Inc. v. Donaldsonpublic domain
739 S.W.2d 384 (1987) CAPITAL TITLE CO., INC., Appellant, v. Darrell DONALDSON, Appellee. No. 01-86-0254-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). August 31, 1987. *385 Paul J. McConnell, III, Ben A. Baring, Jr. De Lange, Hudspeth, Pitman & Katz (on appeal only), Houston, for appellant. Darryl W. Malone, Wood
Marilyn v. Statepublic domain
Roe, C.J. This cause coming on to be heard on the joint stipulation of the parties hereto, the Court being fully advised in the premises, finds; That the multiple-party group of Claimants listed herein consists of 540 Claimants seeking individual judgments of varying amounts. These claims, in the aggregate amount of five hundred ninety thousand six hundred thirty-four do
Chamberlain v. Statepublic domain
The Grand Jury of Etowah County charged the appellant with robbery. The verdict, judgment and sentence fixed punishment at ten years imprisonment. Richard Strawm testified that in January, 1970, he was married to one Diane Strawm, who was at that time employed as the cashier of the "Quick Shop" grocery. He testified that the store opened at 7:00 in the morning and closed at 11:00 in the evening. Mr. Strawm testified that on Wednesday, January 21, 1970, he went to the "Quick Shop" stor
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
People v. Ariaspublic domain
Opinion BAXTER, J. In charges arising out of an incident on May 23, 1987, a jury convicted defendant Pedro Arias of one count of first degree murder (Pen. Code, §§ 187, 189)1 and three counts of robbery (§ 211). As to each count, it was found true that defendant personally used a deadly and dangerous weapon, a knife. (§ 12022, subd. (b).) The jury also found, as a special circumstanc
in Re Joseph Andre Davispublic domain
ACCEPTED 01-15-00408-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS