Cases

Cach, LLC v Ryan (2018 NY Slip Op 00755) Cach, LLC v Ryan 2018 NY Slip Op 00755 Decided on February 2, 2018 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary La

Cach, LLC v Khan (2020 NY Slip Op 07025) Cach, LLC v Khan 2020 NY Slip Op 07025 Decided on November 25, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary L

CACH, LLC, Respondent, againstAdeola Oyedeji, Appellant. Adeola Oyedeji, appellant pro se. Daniels, Norelli, Scully & Cecere, P.C. (Ira R. Sitzer of counsel), for respondent. Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Richmond County (Susan Quirk, J.), entered March 10, 2017. The order denied defendant's motion to vacate a judgment of that court

In an action to recover the outstanding balance due on a credit card, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Diamond, J.), entered April 17, 2015, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the complaint and denied his cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

OPINION OF THE COURT Scott Fairgrieve, J. Plaintiff, as assignee of a consumer debt allegedly owed by defendant upon a credit card issued to him by GE Capital Retail Bank, commenced this action against defendant for breach of contract. Plaintiff now moves, pursuant to CPLR 3212, for summary judgment in the amount of $1,237.65, plus costs and disbursements. The motion is decided as follows.

Cach, LLC, Respondent,againstShiryl Dean, Appellant. Shiryl Dean, appellant pro se. Daniels, Norelli, Scully & Cecere, P.C., Ira R. Sitzer, Esq., for respondent. Appeal from an order of the District Court of Suffolk County, First District (Vincent J. Martorana, J.), entered May 29, 2015. The order denied defendant's motion to vacate a default judgment of the same court

Case: 21-1998 Document: 45 Page: 1 Filed: 05/11/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ SOUND VIEW INNOVATIONS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. HULU, LLC, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2021-1998 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Di

State of New York v Walker (2024 NY Slip Op 00716) State of New York v Walker 2024 NY Slip Op 00716 Decided on February 9, 2024 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law

Case: 21-1998 Document: 45 Page: 1 Filed: 05/11/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ SOUND VIEW INNOVATIONS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. HULU, LLC, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2021-1998 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Di

RODNEY GILSTRAP, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Google LLC's ("Google") Second Renewed Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Transfer under 28 U.S.C. § 1406 for Improper Venue. (Dkt. No. 125) ("the Motion"). Having considered the Motion, the Court is of the opinion that it should be D

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT IN RE: SUBPOENA OF INTERNET No. 24-3978 SUBSCRIBERS OF COX D.C. No. COMMUNICATIONS, LLC 1:23-cv-00426- AND COXCOM, LLC JMS-WRP ______________________________ CAPSTONE STUDIOS CORP.; MILLENNIUM FUNDING, INC.; OPINION VOLTAGE HOLDINGS, LLC

Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.gov. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA ) PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ) Supreme Court Nos. S-18318/18357 AS

Case: 24-1092 Document: 45 Page: 1 Filed: 01/29/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ SOUND VIEW INNOVATIONS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. HULU, LLC, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2024-1092 ______________________ Appeal from the United States D

Hamilton Equity Group, LLC v Benetatos (2025 NY Slip Op 03411) Hamilton Equity Group, LLC v Benetatos 2025 NY Slip Op 03411 Decided on June 6, 2025 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursu

OPINION AND ORDER JESSE M. FURMAN, District Judge. This bitter patent suit involves two manufacturers of sheet pile wall systems, which are often used to construct temporary walls to retain soil or water. Plaintiff Skyline Steel, LLC (“Skyline”) sues Defendant PilePro, LLC (“PilePro”), seeking a declaration that it has not infringed one of PilePro’s patents and that the patent is invalid, as we

14 N.Y.3d 161 (2010) 924 N.E.2d 801 897 N.Y.S.2d 693 In the Matter of LIGHTHOUSE POINTE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES LLC, Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION et al., Respondents. No. 3 Court of Appeals of New York. Argued January 5, 2010. Decided February 18, 2010.

OPINION OF THE COURT Lewis Bart Stone, J. This proceeding was commenced by notice of petition dated December 21, 2007, by petitioner, East River Realty Company, LLC, the owner of four parcels of land located between East 36th Street and East 41st Street on both sides of First Avenue in Manhattan, to review a determination of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) rendered on Octobe

Case: 19-126 Document: 36 Page: 1 Filed: 02/13/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE: GOOGLE LLC, Petitioner ______________________ 2019-126 ______________________ On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Nos. 2:18-cv-00462-JRG, 2:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 20-cv-3010 (APM) ) GOOGLE LLC,

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Decker, Judges Beales, Huff, O’Brien, AtLee, Malveaux, Athey, Fulton, PUBLISHED Ortiz, Causey, Friedman, Chaney, Raphael, Lorish, Callins, White and Frucci Argued at Richmond, Virginia MAZIE GREEN OPINION BY v. Record No. 0144-22-3