Cases

409 F.3d 553 Duane ZIEMBA, on behalf of himself and all persons similarly situated, Plantiff-Appellant,v.M. Jodi RELL, Theresa Lantz, David N. Strange, in their official capacities, Defendants-Appellees. Docket No. 05-8903. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. May 12, 2005. En Banc Rehearing Denied Sua Sponte May 12, 2005. <

ORDER Appellant brought a purported class action in -the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut claiming that the execution of Michael Ross, scheduled for May 13, 2005, would violate his constitutional rights and those of other similarly situated prisoners. Appellant asserts that the media have paid and continue to pay substantial attention to Ross’s case, that such news reports of Ross’s execution wil

B.D. PARKER, JR., Circuit Judge. BACKGROUND Appellant Sebastian Mangiafico, a Captain in the Connecticut Department of Corrections, appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Kravitz, J.), Mangiafico v. Blumenthal, et al., 358 F.Supp.2d 6 (D.Conn.2005), dismissing claims against Connec

425 F.3d 177 Michael BRAHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.CLANCY, C/O, I/O; John Doe, Medic, I/O, Defendants,John J. Armstrong, Comm, I/O, Lantz, Warden, I/O, Nmi Bates, I/O, Brostek, C/O, I/O, Bellaro, C/O, I/O, Barbour, Lt, I/O Defendants-Appellees. Docket No. 03-0153. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Submitted: February 2, 2005.

B.D. PARKER, Circuit Judge. Michael Braham, pro se and incarcerated, appeals the dismissal by the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Smith, M.J.) of claims against several officials1 of the Corrigan Correctional Facility. Braham alleged that a former cellmate had threatened and then assaulted him, and that prison officials, who were aware of the danger

RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Alvin W. Thompson, United States District Judge The plaintiff, James Harnage (“Har-nage”), who is incarcerated within Connecticut’s correctional system, brings this civil rights action pro se pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. Because of the number of claims and defendants in this action, the claims have been separated into three groups. The claims at issue in the instant

358 F.Supp.2d 6 (2005) Sebastian MANGIAFICO, Plaintiff, v. Richard BLUMENTHAL, John Armstrong, and Teresa Lantz, Defendants. No. 3:04CV74MRK. United States District Court, D. Connecticut. March 2, 2005. *7 *8 Michelle N. Holmes, Sack, Spector & Karsten, West Hartford, CT, for Plaintiff.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,

931 A.2d 348 (2007) 103 Conn.App. 662 Yves Henry LORTHE v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION. No. 26354. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued March 20, 2007. Decided September 11, 2007. *353 Damon A.R. Kirschbaum, special public defender, for the appellant (petitioner). James A. Killen,