⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

4 opinions for “Zuma Press, Inc. v. Getty Images (US), Inc.”

District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018-10-04 · Published · cited 1× · 349 F. Supp. 3d 369
ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, United States District Judge This is an action by Zuma Press, Inc. ("Zuma"), nine individual photographers, and two photograph licensing agencies against defendant Getty Images (US), Inc. ("Getty") for copyright infringement under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 501, and for violation of integri
District Court, S.D. New York · 2017-09-25 · Published · cited 12× · 271 F. Supp. 3d 547
OPINION AND ORDER KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge: This is a dispute between two companies that prepare law school graduates for a time-honored (and seemingly Sisyphean) rite of legal passage: the bar examination. Each year, thousands of foreign attorneys obtain Master of Laws (“LL.M.”) degrees from American law schools. Since 2009, Plaintiff LLM Bar
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018-01-25 · Published · cited 21× · 306 F. Supp. 3d 579
VALERIE CAPRONI, United States District Judge *584Grindr, LLC ("Grindr") is a web-based dating application ("app") for gay and bi-sexual men. Plaintiff Matthew Herrick ("Herrick") is a former Grindr user and the victim of a campaign of malicious catfishing:1 since October 2016, Herrick's former boyfriend has used Grindr to impersonate Herric
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018-09-28 · Published · cited 13× · 335 F. Supp. 3d 621
ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: On November 14, 2017, the Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Dkt. 19. On August 27, 2018, Magistrate Judge Barbara Moses recommended that this Court dismiss all of Plaintiff's claims. Dkt. 62. Plaintiff filed objections on September 7, 2018. Dkt. 65. Defendants responded to these objections on September 20, 2018. Dkt. 66.