Cases

ORDER CONWAY, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This cause comes before the Court for consideration of the Joint Motion of Plaintiffs, Defendants, and the State of Florida for Preliminary Approval of Proposed Settlement Decree (Doc. 98), filed March 21, 2000.1 The Court held a hearing on the motion on October 6, 2000. Upon considering the parties’ submissions, th

Boggs, Judge. We granted this interlocutory appeal to consider the trial court’s denial of summary judgment on the issue of qualified immunity for government officials under 42 USC § 1983. 1 Michael Justin Belt was arrested outside the Colonial Mall in Brunswick, Georgia in December 2008, on a charge of misdemeanor obstru

KOUDELIS, J., NATURE AND HISTORY OF THE CASE This is an appeal from an order of the court dated August 19, 1994 granting the Commonwealth parties’ motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. *156The history of the cases is as follows. Johnson brought an action against the Commonwealth parties for wrongful death and

721 F.Supp.2d 62 (2010) ADVANCED ION BEAM TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff, v. VARIAN SEMICONDUCTOR EQUIMENT ASSOCIATES, INC., Norman L. Turner, Kenneth H. Purser, and Alice W. Enge and Elizabeth Dill, as Co-Executrixes of the Estate of Harald A. Enge, Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-11448-NG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. July 2, 2010.

NOTICE: SLIP OPINION (not the court’s final written decision) The opinion that begins on the next page is a slip opinion. Slip opinions are the written opinions that are originally filed by the court. A slip opinion is not necessarily the court’s final written decision. Slip opinions can be changed by subsequent court orders. For example, a court may issue an order making substantive changes to a slip opinion or publishing for precedential pur

175 F.Supp.2d 593 (2001) In re: METHYL TERTIARY BUTYL ETHER ("MTBE") PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION No. 00-Civ. 1898(BS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 20, 2001. *594 *595 *596 *597 Morris A. Ratner, Lieff,

OPINION AND ORDER SCHEINDLIN, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs are residential well owners who brought several actions against twenty oil companies, of whom one or more had allegedly caused contamination of their well water. The suits allege negligence, strict liability, failure to warn, nuisance, trespass, and failure to report toxic substance releases as required

The defendants were convicted of conspiracy. A plea of not guilty was withdrawn in order that a motion might be made to quash the indictment. The motion was denied. The clerk of the court, however, did not reinstate the plea. Notwithstanding, the jury was drawn and the case proceeded with the observation of every formality. Motions for a directed verdict were denied, both at the close of the *Page 331 state's case and at the close of the entire case. Coun

O’Gormar, J. Roche and Timothy Roche were purchasers at a foreclosure sale of the interest of the defendant Aschpurwis in a lease of certain real estate in this city. They have refused to take the deed offered to them by the referee, and petition to be relieved on the grounds: 1st. That the court had not acquired jurisdiction of Aschpurwis, the mortgagor and defendant in this. foreclosure sui

646 S.W.2d 191 (1981) Harden HANKINS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 60914. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. November 18, 1981. On Rehearing March 1, 1983. *192 Don Busby, Temple, for appellant. Arthur C. Eads, Dist. Atty. and James T. Russell, Asst. Dist. Atty., Robert Huttash, State's