Cases

Judgment affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

The judgment is vacated, and a new judgment shall enter affirming the decision of the Sex Offender Registry Board classifying the plaintiff as a Level 2 sex offender.

Judgment affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-3048 ___________________________ J.P., By Next Friend Alisha Ogden Plaintiff - Appellant v. Belton School District No. 124

Here, Mr. Doe has completed his college education and wants only his diploma; he does not ask to attend graduation. While he has been accepted to a graduate program and the loss of an immediate opportunity to enroll is agonizing, that loss is not irreparable, even if he studies at a different university. The gap on which he focuses attention happens normally in the lives of many students, who take a year to decide what to do after college, to travel, to bec

The opinion of the court was delivered by Davis, J.: This case presents the question whether a workers compensation claimant’s use of a false name in applying for benefits and lying under oath as to her identity in the proceeding to obtain benefits were fraudulent or abusive acts under K.S.A. 44-5,120 (1993 Furse) even though the claimant was legally entitled to the benefits she received. Jane Doe, a/k/a Vict

335 S.C. 556 (1999) 518 S.E.2d 259 Jane DOE, by her Guardian ad Litem, Mary ROE, and Mary Roe, individually, Petitioners, v. ORANGEBURG COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2, Respondent. No. 24964. Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard June 9, 1999. Decided July 12, 1999. Rehearing Denied August 17, 1999.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2024 ND 124 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Bradley James Vervalen, Defendant and Appellant No. 20230286 Appeal from the District Court of Rolette County, Northeast Judicial District, the Honorable Anthony S. Benson

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari granted.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS In re FORFEITURE OF $2,124. CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS, FOR PUBLICATION August 11, 2022 Plaintiff-Ap

[Cite as Miller Transp., Inc. v. Hocking Athens Perry Community Action, 2024-Ohio-1017.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Miller Transportation, Inc., : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 23AP-124 v. : (C.P.C. No. 22CV

SELYA, Circuit Judge. This is a hard case- — hard not in the sense that the legal issues defy resolution, but hard in the sense that the law requires that we, like the court below, deny relief to plaintiffs whose circumstances evoke outrage. The result we must reach is rooted in positive law. Congress addressed the right to publish the speech of others in the Information Age when

SILAK, Justice. This case concerns the application of the child custody proceedings of the federal Indian Child Welfare Act (“ICWA”), 25 U.S.C. §§ 1901-1923 (1988), to the termination of the parental rights of an Indian father and the adoption of his child by a non-Indian couple. I. BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS The child in this case was born in 1989. The mother

OPINION JOHNSON, Judge. While employed by the Columbia Heights School District, Christopher Lloyd Warnke engaged in sexual misconduct with a minor student. The student sued Warnke and the school district. The district court granted the school district’s motion for summary judgment on two theories of relief but denied the motion with respect to the student’s theory that the school district should be vicariously